Sea Isle City Passes Ordinance Limiting the Size of New Homes

Ordinance 1584 was passed by City Council this morning with 3 voting in favor and 2 against.     For almost 2 hours, opinions, concerns and questions were exchanged.   Architectural plans were introduced showing three different size duplexes demonstrating that from the front, they will look like they do now whether they are .7, .8 or .9.  The size difference doesn’t mean much except that future homes built will be smaller.   It may be that there is one less bedroom but maybe not.   There is no limit to the number of bedrooms in the Ordinance.  This is exactly what is frustrating because will the difference in size really make a difference?  Will we have that many less cars and people to notice because some homes will be a little smaller?   I doubt it.    The cow left the barn a long time ago.   I also disagree with the quickness in which this all happened.   It was suggested by some concerned people, and I agree, that the Ordinance should become part of the Master Plan for the City that will be completed in about a year by the  City’s Planning Board.   I like this because this very important issue would have been examined more carefully and completely.   It is be better to have real facts to refer to when making good laws.    I think it was hastily done and I am not alone.  But, it is what it is.    A new design is on the horizon.  Please see:    Ord – 1584 – reinstate FAR at 8 – as introduced

The other issue is parking which will be next.  The City wants every duplex (condo/townhouses) to each have 4 parking spaces so that makes 8 parking spots for a side-x-side duplex.   The Ordinance that was just passed doesn’t change the footprint of the buildings.  And the height will not change.  The area remaining around the building will be the same so there won’t be more room for parking.  (The setbacks haven’t changed.)   However, the garages can go the full length of the building which will provide more garage parking unless these areas are closed in and used as living space which will be illegal but there are hundreds of illegal bonus rooms existing today.   What would stop anyone from doing it again?  (I think this is what is referred to as creating a monster, no pun intended.)     The amount of impervious coverage is 70%.  In the architectural drawings provided at today’s meeting, it showed 8 parking spots which would require concrete underneath.    Unless a house is pitched correctly, water could accumulate in the rear of the property.  This created another series of comments and peoples’ ideas of a better way.   It will be a challenge to meet this requirement.     It’s because of bad laws in the past that we don’t have as much parking as we should because the curbs in between the driveways have been cut too small and a car can’t fit.polar-bear-plungeI will keep you up to date as to what happens with the parking.  I hope the solution makes sense.   See you at the Polar Bear Plunge

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *